RT

Small is Beautiful Chapter 3

Jan 11, 2014

AM
Stage· 390 messages
Jan 11, 2014

Returned Peace Corps Volunteer and Green Business Guru Aaron Meyers returns to dissect Chapter 3 of EF Schumacher's seminal work, Small is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered. This week, The Role of Economics. We've established that economics is not a hard science - should it govern public policy? What SHOULD it do?nnFree PDF version of Small is Beautiful at http://www.ee.iitb.ac.in/student/~pdarshan/SmallIsBeautifulSchumacher.pdf

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 8:05 PM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

I've missed these!

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:00 AM

Good evening!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:00 AM

Hello!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:00 AM

How is everyone!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:01 AM

I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that I am featured in Aaron's profile pic.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:01 AM

I'm the one being strangled.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:01 AM

;D
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:01 AM

or, bust ing a Miley.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:01 AM

I was twerking before it was cool?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:01 AM

Let me go check out what's up with Aaron.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:02 AM

Lalala...
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:04 AM

I was going to have potato chips and beer while I did this Tawk, but I've eaten all the chips. So I'm left with quite a nice craft beer.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:04 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

Good evening everyone

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:04 AM

Hey, JB. Howzit?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:05 AM

I'm calling.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:05 AM

so Becky warming up crowd?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:05 AM

There he is!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:05 AM

there I am!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:05 AM

hey, man! How's it been!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:05 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

Friday evening. What could be better?

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:05 AM

good good
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:05 AM

Chips and beer.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:05 AM

I recommend it.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:05 AM

So I see some familiar faces in the crowd
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:06 AM

Out of a wine glass no less. Keeping it classy.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:06 AM

including the fake NSA
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:06 AM

I hear that guy is fake everywhere
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:06 AM

Hahahahaha! yep. All our smarty-pants (es?) are here.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:06 AM

but, that raises a good point, as a government employee I do have to say my usual disclaimer
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:07 AM

★ Spotlighted from Rachel McDonnell

hi! glad I made it! :)

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:07 AM

Hey, rach!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:07 AM

any opinion or statement of fact is merely my own opinion and my own understanding of a fact, not the EPA's
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:07 AM

Oooh, how's that for nuance?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:07 AM

so Beck, you wanna dive right in?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:07 AM

Sure. I'll save the jokes.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:07 AM

:)
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:08 AM

So, we're talking about the ROLE of economics.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:08 AM

before we get too much further, since we do have some familiar faces
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:08 AM

and since it has been awhile
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:08 AM

does anyone have any burning topics from previous chapters
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:08 AM

or things they've thought about since then?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:09 AM

not that I mind interrupting, I don't, but everyone who wants the stage should get the stage
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:09 AM

"How then could peace be built on a foundation of reckless science and violent technology"
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:09 AM

How's that?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:10 AM

Rachel the quick summary of the previous two would more or less be as follows
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:10 AM

the system is broken
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:10 AM

★ Spotlighted from Rachel McDonnell

i think i've missed the other two can you give me a quick overview? :)

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:10 AM

current economics rewards production, not reduction of need created by production
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:10 AM

Eonomocs is not a hard science.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:10 AM

but is treated as such.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:10 AM

yes
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:11 AM

Sigh. Economics, not whatever i typed there.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:11 AM

we are, but there are always examples of hope out there
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:11 AM

im hoping myself to see some in later chapters
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:11 AM

Oh oh!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:11 AM

I heard a report the other day that mentioned cradle to cradle
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:11 AM

if I had to sum up this chapter I would say most of it is about the difference between qualitative and quantitative economics
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:12 AM

really?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:12 AM

being applied to pharaceuticals!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:12 AM

what they say?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:12 AM

There are some small towns who are drafting legistlation to make pharma companies responsible for disposal of outdated product!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:12 AM

And they mentioned cradle-to-cradle methodology.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:13 AM

That's cool, huh?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:13 AM

cradle to cradle for those who don't know, is the idea that everything in your product should be a component of another product that you could make upon reclaiming it
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:13 AM

Of course, there's the usual industry push-back - too expensive, will be passed to the consumer, etc.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:13 AM

it is an idea by McDonough bronguard (sp?)
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:13 AM

But the consumer is already paying via tax dollars.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:13 AM

theres a decent ted talk on it if you search their site
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:14 AM

it is apparently very expensive to get rid of pharamaceuticals safely.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:14 AM

Anyway, i love the idea - in the broader sense, not just pharmaceuticals.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:14 AM

It changes the game.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:14 AM

wildly so
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:14 AM

Substantially.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:14 AM

there are a few companies already practicing it
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:14 AM

Which?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:15 AM

McDonough bronguard is after all a very large consulting group
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:15 AM

Nike I know
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:15 AM

a few others
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:15 AM

sorry late, had to order dinner
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:15 AM

Hey, Fake. You've been mentioned. ;D
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:15 AM

they were contracted out by the government of china to design an entire city
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:15 AM

under the same principle
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:16 AM

WOW!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:16 AM

So..is this city...real?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:16 AM

Like, running and functioning?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:16 AM

its in design
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:16 AM

cities take time
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:16 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

I wonder whatever happened to Rick McCandless.

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:16 AM

NSA got him.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:16 AM

It's cool, though.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:16 AM

Is there open-source material on it?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:17 AM

McDonough bronguard?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:17 AM

no, that's one of their main criticisms
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:17 AM

The city.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:17 AM

But prob not.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:17 AM

they gotta make money somehow
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:17 AM

Yeah.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:17 AM

but the design principles are solid and others are following it
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:17 AM

But some people just put their stuff out if they want it to spread.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:18 AM

Can you talk about specific principles?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:19 AM

well as I said the primary principle is reuse
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:19 AM

but its reuse now downuse
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:19 AM

because it has to be reusable in some way in which you are not downcycling it
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:19 AM

Like the opposite of upcycle?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:20 AM

or burning more energy in the retrofit and reclaiming than it would take to make something new
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:20 AM

Oh - so it is like upcycle.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:20 AM

something that can do this, they call a technical input
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:20 AM

its more than upcycle
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:20 AM

its upcycling with a full modeling of the reclaiming and remanufacturing to make sure its truly upcycled
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:21 AM

regular "upcycling" just means that's recycling doesn't degrade the material
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:21 AM

like aluminum, you can recycle it forever
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:22 AM

plastic on the other hand always recycles to a cheaper form of plastic
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:22 AM

Oh.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:22 AM

So, it's a nature model.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:22 AM

Like water.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:22 AM

yes
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:22 AM

the book itself
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:22 AM

cradle to cradle
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:22 AM

that they publish and promote
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:22 AM

Nice.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:23 AM

is a plastic like weave, that has an easy process that will remove the ink
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:23 AM

and make new books
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:23 AM

making it a technical input
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:23 AM

prison art with can tops and chip bags is a thing
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:23 AM

Also a technical input?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:23 AM

becky nows about chip bag things
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:23 AM

Hahahahaha!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:24 AM

I still have me earrings...
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:24 AM

my
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:24 AM

yes, because the book once reclaimed is the next book
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:24 AM

just by removing and reapplying inc
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:24 AM

ink
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:24 AM

That's a really cool concept.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:24 AM

Like, hella cool.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:24 AM

which is one of mcdonoughs primary complaints
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:24 AM

Why don't they make more things like that?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:25 AM

when you think about it, and model the full process
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:25 AM

like the damned chip bags????
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:25 AM

there is no way to use a tree, to make anything paper basedd
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:25 AM

and not be downcycling
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:25 AM

McDonough wrote a book?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:25 AM

which one should I read
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:25 AM

because nothing you make from the tree is as essential to manufacturing more tree based products, as a tree itself
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:25 AM

That's true. it takes SO MUCH WATER to recycle paper.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:25 AM

its called cradle to cradle
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:26 AM

so, on to chapter 3
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:26 AM

Yes!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:26 AM

any product is made up of other products
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:26 AM

I don't know as much about leather nsa
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:26 AM

Fake NSA kind of hit it on the head.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:26 AM

Aaron, talk about leather
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:26 AM

Not about the leather.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:26 AM

i know the recent mcdonalds promise to move to sustainable beef though is going to be good for leather
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:27 AM

I know sausage plants make a lot of leather.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:27 AM

a lot of leather is from south American cattle farms that are run with some of the most horrendous practices
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:27 AM

and the more tracable leather is, the more those people get caught
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:27 AM

Or Oklahoma sausage plants that employ Central American workers and don't have the best practices.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:28 AM

nike had to do a similar intiative a few years ago to make sure they didn't have similar problems
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:28 AM

it's tough sourcing holistic leather
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:28 AM

these are worse than anything you're likely to find in Oklahoma becky
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:28 AM

True enough, from both of you.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:28 AM

they were clear cutting rainforest, displacing or indenturing natives
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:28 AM

to work cattle operations
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:28 AM

Yeah. Pretty UN-Bueno.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:29 AM

then putting leather products into large resellers who asked no questionas
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:29 AM

then could get it to big users
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:29 AM

Users don't ask many questions.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:29 AM

i mean, how many sustainable baseballs have you seen marketed?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:29 AM

Footballs?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:29 AM

Sneakers?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:29 AM

that's a good question
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:29 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

It's very hard to be a consumer in this world and NOT support a practice you find abhorrent.

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:29 AM

like i said, nike, their considered line
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:30 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jane Smith

blood diamonds anyone?,,buyers don't care...it's a sign of love

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:30 AM

i just know a lot about them cuz i had to consult on the topic getting my mba
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:30 AM

sorry to hit the same hourse
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:30 AM

im actually working on my own engagement ring jane
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:30 AM

making our own so we know its legal
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:30 AM

It's great. i love tapping into random knowledge - stuff you wouldn't normally think to ask.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:30 AM

and moral
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:31 AM

Because you're awesome! <3
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:31 AM

how long have you been working on it?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:31 AM

just a couple weeks so far
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:31 AM

taking classes from scratch
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:32 AM

Alright! Chapter 3!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:32 AM

So..."economics"
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:32 AM

it has cast it's pall over most things in modern society.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:32 AM

Describing somethign as "economic" or uneconomic"
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:32 AM

determines it's prudence, its right to EXIST or be done.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:33 AM

which is weird, since we've previously determined that economics isn't really a very reliable science.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:33 AM

well its reliable within certain limited conditions
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:34 AM

It seems that calling something "uneconomic" can justify a lot of bad behavior.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:34 AM

its just not the silver bullet of social science tools people make it out to be
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:34 AM

Yes. Purely on statistical grounds, economics can be reliable.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:34 AM

In terms of metadata, in telling what happened, it's reliable.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:35 AM

But in terms of predicting future behaviors....
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:35 AM

there's this billboard right outside Chattanooga that proclaims economic predictions to be "mostly shovelready"
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:35 AM

economics is only a science as long as capitalism exists
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:35 AM

well any systems engineer who tells you they can build a metadata driven model for the purpose of predicting the future is selling something
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:36 AM

Exactly!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:36 AM

On both counts!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:36 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jane Smith

anybody hear Chomsky on Huff Psot say say Capitalism is Savagery the other day?

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:36 AM

No - but YES!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:36 AM

And Schumacher gets to the same in Chapter 3.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:36 AM

He calls economics a religion.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:37 AM

And enumerates its commandments.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:37 AM

so we arrive at the question what does it mean to be
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:37 AM

"uneconomic"
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:37 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

I think the meaning of the words "economics" and "capitalism" have been so manipulated as to be virtually indecipherable.

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:37 AM

most people would understand that to mean not profitablew
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:38 AM

They mean what the hearere thinks they mean.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:38 AM

I agree - because economics is concerned maily with profit.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:38 AM

but something uneconomic cant be by default not worth doing
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:38 AM

Uneconomic is not profitable.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:38 AM

what are some of the things we do that are not profitable but worth it
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:38 AM

Art
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:38 AM

Breastfeeding
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:38 AM

Becky has a great example, that doesn't like hot chocolate
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:38 AM

Exercise
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:39 AM

exercise is profitable, in a wide sense
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:39 AM

you having a child, is not
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:39 AM

Hahahahaha.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:39 AM

its a money hole
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:39 AM

yeah, raising your 2-year-old.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:39 AM

Staying home with a kid when i have a degree is even less profitable.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:39 AM

no, altruism can be incredibly profitable
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:40 AM

in fact i find some of the best models of altruism are profit based models
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:40 AM

That's very true.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:40 AM

And I have seen some of the BEST altruism be profitable in this day and age.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:40 AM

Oh wait - you just said that!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:40 AM

because if you're building something genuinely of use to those who need it, profit is the surest way to make sure you respond to how those in need adapt and change over time
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:41 AM

that's where we get Tom's shoes
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:41 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

Any examples?

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:41 AM

a lot of design changes in the cell phone market
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:41 AM

to make them more rugged
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:41 AM

a few companies have adjust the sizes of their shampoo bottles to fit price points of the poor
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:41 AM

There are also consulting firms that work to help nonprofits make money. They increase revenues exponentially.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:42 AM

that's why a lot of companies, even if they don't supply to hotels, still make tiny bottles
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:42 AM

But they come under heavy media fire as "overhead costs."
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:42 AM

well high overhead isn't necessarily a bad thing
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:42 AM

people make that mistake all the time
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:42 AM

Exactly.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:43 AM

when you are deciding where to donate money, people always ask, how much money is going to the people
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:43 AM

If you're beinging in 4X the emount of revenue but spending aportion of that on the contractor, you still make more money.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:43 AM

how much is salary
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:43 AM

wrong question
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:43 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

High overhead usually means "employing lots of people."

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:43 AM

what you should be asking is, how much result are you buying with your dollar
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:43 AM

if non profit a, pays 40% of your dollar in salary
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:44 AM

and non profit B pays 2%
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:44 AM

And, from the perspective of someone who worked in the third world, having that many more white collar workers IS helpful.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:44 AM

but non profit A, does work 100 times more efficiently
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:44 AM

then A is your better investment
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:44 AM

(to answer JB's comment)
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:45 AM

no shame in drunk typing
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:45 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jane Smith

i quit typing...i type too fasssst and don't edit and I appear drunk...I'm done

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:45 AM

It's Friday. We don't judge at Tawkers! ;D
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:45 AM

And geez - look at my typos! Or don't.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:45 AM

Please don't.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:46 AM

now, there have been some economic studies since that have indicated that pure economic pursuit isn't necessarily a good ting
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:46 AM

and it has shown them in interesting ways
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:46 AM

Oooh, do tell!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:46 AM

one of the results of the last recession were several published sources that showed a negative impact upon the economy if too much of the economy is from financial products
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:47 AM

and not the actual making of stuff
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:47 AM

Further, Schumacher notes that the measure of the economy is only of stuff taht is made or that makes money
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:48 AM

this is now an emerging economic indicator
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:48 AM

not the intangibles or the provided goods.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:48 AM

What is?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:48 AM

Percentage of economy that is tangible goods?
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:48 AM

the percent of the economy that is in financial products
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:48 AM

money made from trades bonds etc
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:48 AM

and not actual stuff
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:49 AM

"Monopoly money'
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:49 AM

when you look at our growth in gnp jane usually the one thing we've proven to make is new companies
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:49 AM

LOL
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:50 AM

and we make them at a growth rate and with a growth rate, that is bigger than our decreases in production
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:50 AM

or outsourcing to other countries
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:50 AM

That's absurd!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:50 AM

which is where a lot of gnp growth comes from
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:50 AM

it's like....a Woody Allen film! So funny it hurts!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:50 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

Our society is a giant shell game.

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:51 AM

So...Scumacher points out that the measure of economics
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:51 AM

like GNP
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:51 AM

serves to excuse the individual from responsibility
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:51 AM

now if we start asking ourselves, what does this buy us, and not pursuing something for profit though, we run into some hard decisions
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:52 AM

He's expected to be a bargain-hunter, whether as a consumer or a producer.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:52 AM

one example in the book i do not like is the putting of a man on the moon
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:52 AM

the book says we did it because the means are available
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:52 AM

and not because of a human need
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:52 AM

I do like that example, though.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:52 AM

in this one example i think it misses the mark
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:53 AM

i think there was an actual need to put a man on the moon
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:53 AM

I think we need to tend to our chickens here on earth - or, rather, take care of the first planet.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:53 AM

I can see the argument both ways.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:53 AM

putting a man on the moon does that
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:53 AM

let me make my case
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:53 AM

Proceed. ;)
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:53 AM

the man on the moon was the result of a public private partnership
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:53 AM

government and industry working together
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:54 AM

historically, the government sets a big goal, and they either set up the infrastructure to invent a thing
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:54 AM

or invent a thing and spread it through industry
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:54 AM

this is how big advancements in society happen
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:55 AM

the government sets a goal like a man on the moon, because it drives people to do big things
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:55 AM

and when the government, usually the us government is behind it, they don't try to own the solution
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:55 AM

which means everyone gets a piece much sooner
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:56 AM

all the technologies that come from space
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:56 AM

the internet
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:56 AM

modern medicine
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:56 AM

mapping the genome and medical advances based upon it
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:56 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

I wish they would set the goal: handle climate change.

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:56 AM

auto mobile travel
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:56 AM

all private/public partnerships
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:56 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

Not to mention the film Gravity.

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:57 AM

because a government guy and an industry guy both agreed on doing something big
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:57 AM

so i think the example is faulty
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:57 AM

I see your point, but I also see Schumacher's.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:58 AM

we should be worried more about climate adaption than actually turning back change
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:58 AM

Indeed, i love the arts and sciences. I think they are the most beautiful pursuits of mankind. But in terms of need...well, we need to take care of our responsibilites.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:58 AM

but that's an argument for another day
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:58 AM

and a tawk of a whole different kind
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:59 AM

If we had been as focused on avoiding climate ctastrophe as putting a man on the moon, maybe we wouldn't be needing to adapt so much.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:59 AM

I don't trust the mail system on earth let alone in space
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 2:59 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jane Smith

becky? are responsibilites basic human needs?

AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:59 AM

Becky to do that we would have had to turn back the clock ages ago
AM

Aaron Meyers · 2:59 AM

and started working on this around WW2
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:00 AM

from the very acknowledgement of climate change as a thing, its been known that its more or less unavoidable, we
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:00 AM

are just arguing to dull the edge a bit
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:00 AM

make it more livable
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:00 AM

Responsibilites are what we need to attend to. If we fulfill our needs responsibly, we don't have giant catastropes to clean up later. if we practice stewardship in, say eating, we have clean, healthy food AND a clean, healthy environment.
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:01 AM

give me a couple of months and an open schedule, i'll talk to some people about running a climate change simulation here
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:02 AM

BUT AARON - if we had admitted it in the 60s, we could have done so much more to make it better NOW!!!!!!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:02 AM

right now the facts are known to the point where we can actually assign people the roles of united nations members, give them a set of policy options
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:02 AM

and ill tell you how soon we're effed
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:02 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jane Smith

The hippies were right about everything

AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:02 AM

jane i have that on a t-shirt :P
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:03 AM

"the hippies were right"
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:03 AM

Well, weed is back in vogue...
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:03 AM

I want that t-shirt!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:03 AM

Okay,
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:03 AM

so...
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:03 AM

anyhow, it is now 10:03
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:03 AM

and my brain needs to go off
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:03 AM

see you all hear next week
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:03 AM

tell your friends!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:03 AM

;)
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:04 AM

Thansk for being here, Aaron!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:04 AM

I have missed you!
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:04 AM

post on the facebook event site if you have topics you want to bring up
AM

Aaron Meyers · 3:04 AM

miss you too beckers!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:04 AM

NO ONE ELSE CAN CALL ME THAT!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:04 AM

EVER.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:04 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jane Smith

see ya, loved this tawk as per usual

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:04 AM

★ Spotlighted from Jordan Birnbaum

Great Tawk!

RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:05 AM

Nope, Jane.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:05 AM

Nope.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:05 AM

Aaron is the only person who can get away with that.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:05 AM

ONLY.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:05 AM

Okay...
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:05 AM

So...
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:05 AM

if you want to hang around and indulge me,
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:06 AM

Schumacher makes some incredible points
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:07 AM

about the market being shallow and superficial, but thereby granting creedence to the notions of individualism and irresponsibility.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:08 AM

We buy things, we sell things, and, hey, it's not our problem - we wanted it and we had to make the best deal.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:09 AM

We have "Consumerism Commandments" - Behave Economically, or, as a consumer, Enjoy Yourself (i.e., BUY).
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:09 AM

It's gross and cultish.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:09 AM

All qualitiative distinctions are suppressed.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:10 AM

Ther eis only talk of quantity - of profit.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:11 AM

And when good enter the market, they are all calculated as equivalent - only in terms of profit, with no consideration given to WHAT THEY ARE.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:11 AM

Primary goods are counted the same as secondary goods
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:11 AM

but all primary goods are gifts from the environment
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:11 AM

and all secondary goods are constructed from those.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:12 AM

Further,
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:12 AM

Primary goods are either renewable or non-renewable, which should drastically change their relative values (but doesn't)
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:12 AM

and all secondary goods are either manufactures or services.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:13 AM

So we have 4 distinct categories of goods
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:13 AM

and they are all measured in terms of profit
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:13 AM

which is absurd.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:14 AM

"An expansion of man's abilit yto bring forth secondary products is useless unless preceeded by an expansion of his ability to win primary products from the earth"
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:14 AM

"Man is not a producer, but only a converter."
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:15 AM

Therefore, shortages.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:15 AM

This was written almost half a century ago.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:15 AM

We've had this info and still we're in the mess we're in today - polar vortex and all.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:16 AM

What I'm interested in is what this means for us.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:17 AM

I mean, here, we have the absurdities in the system dissected.
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:17 AM

So how do we do better?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:17 AM

How can we live so that sports stars aren't paid a bajillion dollars and teacher barely enough to get by and buy their own classroom supplies?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:18 AM

How can economics become a reliable measure instead of laughable?
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:18 AM

That's what we'll talk about next week, with BUDDHIST ECONOMICS!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:18 AM

I'll see you all then!
RT

Rebecca Westbrook Toker · 3:18 AM

Have a wonderful weekend!